After you’ve finished researching, writing, and publishing your report it’s time to create a strategy for how to get your report out into the world.  The report release creates an opportunity for you to publicize your work to media, organizational allies, public officials and others.  A successful release can also be a good launching point for a campaign. This section features activities and tools that will assist your group in the report release process. It will help you devise a release strategy, plan for the release, and outreach to allies and the media. It also includes sample materials from previous report releases.

Activity 7.1

Activity: 7.1 Choosing a Strategy for Releasing the Report

Purpose of Activity:

The purpose of this activity is to educate participants about different types of research report release strategies so that you can make an informed decision about what type of report release strategy you will take.

By the End of Activity Participants Will:

  • Learn about different types of release strategies
  • Discuss the positive and negative aspects of using each strategy
  • Decide a release strategy

Before this Activity Participants Will Need to:

Be informed about your research project

Tool Needed:

Tool 7.1: Types of Report Releases

Materials Needed:

Butcher Paper


Intended Audience:

Community members who have been actively involved in the research project

Time Needed:

45 minutes

Part I. Media Release Strategies (45 minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

  1. Frame the activity: today we are going to review and discuss different types of report release strategies in order to decide which strategy we want to use to release our report.
  2. First, let’s brainstorm some goals for the release that can then help us determine which type of release we should use. What do we want to accomplish through the release?  Who do we want to impact?  Who is our audience?   Write answers up on butcher paper.
  3. Pass out Tool 7.1: Media Release Strategies. Give basic introductions/definitions of each type of strategy.
  4. Split participants into 4 small groups. Assign each small group one of the four media release strategies. Be sure each group has butcher paper and markers.
  5. Have each small group discuss pros and cons of the strategy assigned to them and how it compares to the goals for your report release. Ask them to write their answers on butcher paper and be ready to be report to the large group.
  6. Come back together as a big group and have each small group present their pros and cons. Take time for questions and answers after each group presents and remember to refer back to the goals for the release.
  7. Next discuss which strategy is most suitable to your project and come to a decision about what format you will use for your release.

Activity 7.2

Activity: 7.2 Planning for the Report Release

Purpose of Activity:

The purpose of this activity is to collectively plan out everything your group needs to do to prepare for your report release.

By the End of this Activity Participants Will:

Delegate roles and responsibilities in preparation for your report release

Before this Activity Participants Will Need to:

Be informed about your research project

Intended Audience:


Members who have been actively involved in the research project

Materials Needed:

Blank butcher paper

Butcher Paper with Report Release Planning Chart



Tools Needed:

T7.2: To Do List for Report Release

Time Needed:

1 hour, 15 minutes

Part I. Brainstorming the Release (30 minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

  1. Frame the activity: now that we know the type of release we will use, let’s brainstorm some ideas for what will happen at the release. We are not going to make any decisions yet, we are just throwing out ideas. Write all ideas on butcher paper.
    • What do we want to DO at this event? Some examples: review research, hear personal stories, show examples of the problem, present pictures or visuals, share our recommendations.
    • Who do we want to invite to this event? Some examples: elected officials, media, community members, allies.
    • Where could we have this event? Some examples: City Hall, our neighborhood, community space, university, park, etc.
    • When could we have this event? What day of the week will be best for most people? What time of day will be best? How much time will we need to prep?
    • Who would speak at this event? Some examples: members, allies, elected officials, community groups, etc?
    • How do we want to present our research? Some examples: factsheets, speakers, PowerPoint, stories, posters, video, etc.
  2. Sum up the ideas mentioned and point out trends in the ideas. (“A number of you mentioned the importance of emphasizing personal stories during the release”, etc).


Part II. Report Release Planning Chart (45 minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

  1. Frame the activity: in order to ensure the report release is a success there is a lot of preparation and planning we need to do as a group. The focus of today’s activity is to do all of the necessary planning for the report release.
  2. In advance of the meeting prepare a large sheet of butcher paper with the table from Tool 7.2: To-Do List for a Report Release (Note: These are just suggestions of tasks, these tasks will differ depending on the type of release).
  3. Go through the table and fill out each section.  Be sure to fill out the when column with dates. Add to the list any additional tasks that need to be accomplished before your release.

Activity 7.3

Activity: 7.3 Bringing in Allies

Purpose of Activity:

The purpose of this activity is to think strategically as a group about the ally organizations to which you will outreach, and to create an outreach plan.

By the End of Activity Participants Will:

  • Identify allies and adversaries of your organization that may affect your report release
  • Create a plan to draw allies to your report release


Before this Activity Participants Will Need to:

Be informed about your research project


Intended Audience:


Members who have been actively involved in the research project


Materials Needed:

Butcher Paper



Time Needed:

1 hour


Part I. Identifying Allies and Adversaries (30 minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

  1. Frame the activity: this activity is designed for us to identify allies and adversaries of our project and organization. By identifying allies we can potentially broaden the impact of our report release by drawing strategic allies to play a role in the release, and/or more people to the release. By identifying who are adversaries are we can anticipate how opposition might affect the release of our report.
  2. As a large group identify three categories of allies and potential allies of your organization or campaign: like-minded community-based organizations, legal, resource or advocacy organizations, government officials.  Record them in a list on butcher paper. (If you have a group of more than 10 participants you might split into small groups and have each group brainstorm allies and report back.)
  3. Discuss your organization’s relationships with the potential allies listed, discuss how the allies would affect your release and decide whether or not you want to outreach to each group listed. Circle all groups you want to outreach to for the next activity.
  4. On a different sheet of paper list potential adversaries to your organization or project. Be as specific as possible. Focus on the groups that may affect or be present at your release event.
  5. Go through the list of adversaries and discuss how each group could potentially affect your release. Then discuss how you might account for their actions or counter-arguments.
  6. Record list of any actions you might take to account for your adversaries.

Part II. Create an Outreach Plan (30 Minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

1. Prepare a sheet of butcher paper with the table below:

AllyWhat You’re Asking ForWhoWhen

2. In the Ally column, list all allies that you circled in the previous activity. Discuss and fill out the rest of the chart by clarifying what you are asking of each ally; deciding who in your organization is the most appropriate person to contact them, and when you should reach out to them.

3. Be sure to keep the results of your table for future reference.

Activity 7.4

Activity: 7.4 Using the Media

Purpose of Activity:

The purpose of this activity is to brainstorm and identify media targets for the research report.

By the End of Activity Participants Will:

  • Brainstorm possible media outlets
  • Identify media targets


Before this Activity Participants Will Need to:

Be informed about your research project

Materials Needed:

Butcher Paper





Intended Audience:

Staff of your organization

Members who have been actively involved in the research project

Time Needed:

50 minutes


Part I. Media Scattergories (30 minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

  1. Frame the activity: in order to draw media to your release you need to do targeted media outreach. This activity will enable us to both identify possible media outlets and to decide on which outlets we want to target.
  2. Ask members to brainstorm different types of media (e.g. TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, online). Record each category on butcher paper.
  3. Introduce that you will play a quick game of media scattergories to brainstorm possible media outlets to target.
  4. Give each participant pen and paper.
  5. Next choose one media category to begin with (e.g. TV, Radio, Blogs, Newspapers, Magazines) and give each participant 30 seconds to write down as many media outlets (e.g. ABC, CBS, WLNY etc) they can think of per category.
  6. Record responses in a list on butcher paper.
  7. Give a point to every participant who came up with a name that nobody else thought of.  Ask everyone to record their points after each round.
  8. Go through each category tallying points after each round. After finishing each round tally points, when you have finished each category tally total points and see who wins!
  9. Keep the list of recorded media outlets for the next activity.

Part II. Identify media targets (20 minutes)

Facilitator Instructions:

  1. If your organization has a list of media contacts, print out copies in advance of the meeting and give one to each of your members.
  2. Using the list of media outlets you created through the scattergory activity, as a group go through the list and star each outlet where your organization has a personal contact.
  3. Then go through and star any other outlets that you think you can realistically turn out to your release.

Tool 7.1

Tool: 7.1 Media Release Strategies

Press Conference:

Is a news event where journalists are invited to hear a prepared presentation or statement.  Journalists are often allowed to ask questions of the presenter(s).

7.1 En

Audience: Press, allies, members, elected officials.

Set-up: Podium or stage with people standing behind the speaker to show their support for the message.  Often held at a strategic location (city hall, at a campaign specific site, etc.).

Benefits: Less work, easier to get elected officials to attend, easier to get press to attend.

Drawbacks: Not able to share as much in-depth information about the report as at policy briefing.

Roles: MC; People to give testimony; Presenter for findings/recommendations; Elected official to introduce or endorse the report (optional).


Policy Briefing:

Is a forum for your organization to share the findings and recommendations from your report with policy makers, elected officials and others that have interest in the given issue.

Audience: Policy makers, government staffers, allies, funders.

Set-up: Usually held in a more formal location and the program includes a briefing on findings and policy recommendations, testimonies by people directly impacted by the issue and/or panel discussion, Q and A.

Benefits: Better able to share findings, more in depth, can attract allies and policy makers.

Drawbacks: Not always as energizing as an action/rally, can be more difficult to attract media, can take more time and capacity to organize.

Roles: Facilitator; People to give testimony; Panelists; Presenter for power point; Government official(s) to introduce or comment on report (optional).



Is a gathering of people to show support or voice concern about a particular issue.  This can resemble or be combined with a press conference.

Audience: Members, allies, public, press.

Set-up: Action that involves members and allies.  Can be creative and take place in a setting that draws attention to your report (i.e. in front of a vacant condo for a report about vacant condos or in front of a supermarket for a report about access to healthy food).

Benefits: Can be a significant display of power, can be energizing for members and can draw media.

Drawbacks: May not allow you to fully showcase your research findings and may be less effective in bringing out elected officials and policy makers.

Roles: MC; Speakers.

Community Meeting:

Is a gathering of community members to discuss and educate about the contents of the report.  This can be used as a way to develop a plan of action to implement the report’s recommendations.

Audience: Members, allies.

Set-up: Internal meeting to report information back to community.

Benefits: Good for situations that deal with sensitive information intended for community members.

Drawbacks: Not as effective for bringing in media or government officials.

Roles: MC; Speakers; Presenter for findings/recommendations.

Tool 7.2

Tool: 7.2 Report Release To-Do List

Tool 7.2
as a
Word Doc

Determine goals, audience and format for release
Pick a date for release
Pick a venue for release
Create a “Save the Date” flyer
Create a formal invitation/letter
Create invite list
Conduct outreach (send “Save the Date” and Invites)
Create a program/agenda for event
Create a media & outreach plan
Select spokespeople
Write Testimony
Write the speaker’s bios
Gather quotes from spokespeople
Write press advisory and press release
Designate media point person
Create a Power Point
Track RSVPs
Assign roles for day of release event
Do Press outreach
Compile Press Packets
Conduct a prep session for report release
Send out media advisory (2-3 days before event)
Send out press release (day of event)

Tool 7.3

Tool: 7.3 Sample Report Release Invite Letter

Tool 7.3
as a
Word Doc

[insert your organization’s logo or put on organizational letterhead]

January 2009

Dear Friend,

We cordially invite you to the release of a report, Stuck in the System: How NYS Can Improve Public Health by Aligning the Penal Code with Public Health Law.  This report is the result of a community survey administered by Voices of Community Advocates and Leaders (VOCAL) and analyzed by the Urban Justice Center’s Community Development Project. The report documents the experiences of Syringe Exchange Program (SEP)/Extended Syringe Access Program (ESAP) participants and offers several recommendations to improve public health and safety in New York State.

Stuck in the System will be officially released on Friday, January 29th, 2009 at 10am at a press conference at 250 Broadway in the Lower Manhattan.

Syringe exchange programs promote safe-syringe practices, reduce the spread of HIV and other blood borne illnesses, and improve overall public health. These lawful programs allow properly documented participants to possess sterile or used syringes. However, the New York State Penal code does not recognize the Public Health Law exemptions and many lawful SEP participants are subjected to harassment, arrest or even incarceration, significantly reducing the effectiveness of these programs.

VOCAL, the nation’s only membership organization led by active and former users developed this research project to document the experiences of SEP and ESAP participants. With research support from the Urban Justice Center’s Community Development Project, VOCAL conducted over 75 surveys, 10 in-depth interviews and additional literature reviews.  Stuck in the System contains the results of the surveys and interviews, as well as several vital policy recommendations that will increase the effectiveness of syringe exchange programs and improve public health and safety.

What: Press Conference and Release of Stuck in the System: How NYS Can Improve Public Health by Aligning the Penal Code with Public Health Law

When: Friday, January 29th, 2009 at 10am

Where: 250 Broadway in Lower Manhattan

If you have any questions or would like to RSVP for the press conference, please contact ________________at___________ or _________. We look forward to hearing from you soon.


Voices of Community Advocates and Leaders (VOCAL)

The Urban Justice Center’s Community Development Project

Tool 7.4

Tool: 7.4 Contents of a Press Packet


The purpose of a press packet (a.k.a. a press kit) is to provide the media with concise, useful, and compelling documents or information regarding your organization, its issues, and the event for which you want to receive coverage. The materials included in a press packet should be graphically appealing and easy to read. Generally, press packets are distributed to journalists when they arrive at a press conference, briefing, meeting or interview. Materials included in a press packet can vary but should generally include the following:

Press/News Release

The press release is a news story which is written in an objective way so that reporters can reprint the release in its entirety as a news story. The release should always include a catchy headline, the main point of the report, several quotes from at least two spokespeople, and references to any detailed materials regarding the organization, the event, or the issue that are available to the press.  This should be as short as possible with the most important information at the beginning because journalists often only skim press releases.  The release should also include contact information for someone at your organization who will field calls from the press.

List and Short Biographies (Bios) of Speakers

The name of each speaker should be listed on a sheet according to their speaking order at the event. In addition, you should include a short bio with the title, organization and other pertinent background information for each speaker.  The bio should be very short and specifically tailored to the issue or event that you are organizing.


Printed statements from each event speaker and, if appropriate, from other supporting individuals or organizations not present at the event should be included in the packet in the proper speaking order. The statements should be in the first person voice and should be directly related to the issue or event you are organizing.

Background Statement

An organizational information sheet or brochure should also be included. This statement should not exceed 1-2 pages and should include the following items:

• The organization’s name and logo.

• The mission or main purpose of the organization as well as short highlights of the organization’s main accomplishments

• When the organization was founded

• The organization’s recent accomplishments

Report and/or Fact Sheets

A copy of the report, document or item that is the focus of the event should always be included in the press packet. Additionally, you might include fact sheets that highlight your most significant findings.

Print Visuals

If possible, include one or two visuals (e.g. photos, illustrations, cartoons, charts, tables, illustrations) that the press can use to illustrate the story. You can use black-and-white or color materials that are 5” x 7” or larger.  Also have these visuals in electronic format and be prepared to email them to journalists as requested.

Press Packet Folder

All the above-referenced materials should be distributed in a standard, color folder with two pockets on the inside flaps. A business card for your organization’s media contact should be inserted into the slot found on the inside of the folder. A printed sticker, which has a graphic design and words that reflect the key message of the issue, event and the organization sponsoring the event should appear on the front of the folder. Alternatively, the sticker can also be an enlarged version of your group or organization’s logo.

Tool 7.5

Tool: 7.5 Tips on Crafting Testimony for a Report Release

Testimony at a report release should:

Focus on one or two issues or findings from your report

Be personal and tell a story about how the research impacts you personally

Share key data from the research

Share recommendations from your report

Motivate your audience to take action

Possible Outline for Testimony:

  1. Introduce yourself and your organization (could include your name, where you live, and any other personal information that you think is important to share with your audience).
  2. Explain why you are here today and why the report you are releasing today is personally important to you.
  3. Tell a personal story about how you have been impacted by the issues that are discussed in your report.
  4. Give 3-4 findings or key pieces of data from your research to connect your personal story to the research.
  5. Give 3-4 recommendations from your research that are connected to the findings or data you just presented.
  6. Call to Action or a motivational closing that calls on the audience to take action to fix the social issues you highlight in your report.

Who Should Give Testimony at a Report Release?

Someone that has a personal story to tell about the issues you discuss in your report.

Someone that was actively involved in the research process.

Someone that is an active member in your organization.

Tool 7.6

Tool: 7.6 Select Media Outlets in New York City


Bloomberg Television
MNN –Manhattan Neighborhood Network
MSG-Madison Square Garden Network
New York 1 (NY1)
News 12 Long Island
WNYW-Fox 5




AM New York
Columbia Spectator
Crain’s New York Business
Daily News
El Diario
Empire State News
Gotham Gazette
Metro New York
News India Times
Queens Chronicle
Queens Courier
State Island Advance
The Jewish Post
The Jewish Week
The Manhattan Times
The New York Observer
The New York Post
The New York Times
The Riverdale Press
The Village Voice
The Villager
The Wave of Long Island
The Western Queens Gazette
Times Ledger
Wall Street Journal
Washington Square News


Case Study: 7.1 Stabilizing NYC and CDP Report: The Predatory Equity Story: Tenant Perspectives on Speculative Landlords, Displacement, and Fighting for Justice, 2017


Background on Coalition and Issue

Over the past decade, New York City’s affordable housing market has been severely destabilized. Following the financial crisis of 2008, buildings across the City fell into foreclosure or were sold by long-time landlords. At the same time, many housing organizations noticed new entities buying up large portfolios of rent-stabilized buildings. Often these new owners took on huge amounts of debt and used mortgage loans from banks to finance the deals.

Hoping to seize an opportunity to profit, these new owners began aggressively pushing rent-stabilized tenants out, in order to increase rent revenue, using a wide range of harassment techniques. Housing organizations identified this behavior as “predatory equity,” which can be described as speculative and risky financial investment in buildings, with the expectation of quick, tremendous profits at the expense of tenant quality of life and building conditions.

Stabilizing NYC was formed in 2014 in order to organize against predatory equity’s threat to affordable housing, and share and build on the collective experiences of New York City tenants. The coalition realized that while the tactics of predatory equity landlords may look different in different neighborhoods, it was all part of the same overarching strategy to displace long-term rent-stabilized tenants.

In order to document the practices of predatory equity landlords and create a definition of predatory equity rooted in tenant experiences, SNYC partnered with the Community Development Project at the Urban Justice Center (CDP) to conduct a participatory action research project. The project ultimately resulted in a report that describes the aggressive tactics that predatory equity landlords use to push out rent-stabilized tenants and increase the number of market-rate tenants, and outlines legislation that would protect tenants from harassment and force landlords to prioritize tenant safety. The findings from the report were shared at a community meeting where tenants from across the city discussed the research and brainstormed ways to increase tenant power across boroughs, and will be used to advocate for the legislation outlined in the report.

Below is a description of the Stabilizing NYC Research Project, based on the Participatory Action Research guiding framework (see Tools 2.1 and 2.2).


Were the Organizing Goals connected to this research?

  • Identify what predatory equity looks like across the City and the emotional effect of PE on the lives of tenants;
  • Develop a frame and platform that puts all various manifestations of predatory equity together under one umbrella to communicate the story about predatory equity in NYC to elected officials and the wider community;
  • To ultimately change the ways that buildings are valued, priced and lent/mortgaged in a way that is responsible and sustainable for tenants.

Overall questions did SNYC want to answer through their research?

  • What is the on-the-ground definition of predatory equity?
  • What does predatory equity look like in each borough from the perspective of rent stabilized tenants?
  • What is the impact of predatory equity on the lives of tenants?
  • What is the emotional impact of predatory equity on tenants and communities?


Is this research useful or important for SNYC?

  • INTERNALLY: to base build and educate rent-stabilized tenants; to develop member leaders and their outreach skills; to form a citywide tenant union;
  • EXTERNALLY: to build a platform for elected officials and other key government officials to understand the various ways that predatory equity affects tenants; to highlight the coalition’s work on combatting aggressive tactics employed by landlords to push out rent-stabilized tenants.


Are the Stakeholders in this Issue?

  • Tenants living in rent-stabilized apartments in New York City.

Was SNYC trying to influence?

  • New York City Councilmembers, Mayor’s office, predatory equity landlords, mortgage lenders financing predatory equity landlords.


Did the coalition gather information (what methods did they use)?

  1. FOCUS GROUPS: Stabilizing NYC groups conducted 10 focus groups across the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens with tenants living in predatory equity buildings where SNYC is actively organizing. The focus groups were conducted in English, Spanish, Bangla and Chinese and gathered qualitative data about the experience of living in a predatory equity building.
  2. SURVEYS: SNYC tenant members and organizers collected 877 surveys from 158 predatory equity buildings in the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens where SNYC is actively organizing. The surveys were administered in English, Spanish, Chinese and Bangla and collected quantitative data from tenants.
  3. SECONDARY RESEARCH: CDP researchers collected background information on harassment cases and building violations of the landlords and buildings that the coalition was targeting in order to explore the extent to which landlords are harassing tenants and neglecting their repair needs.
  4. LITERATURE/LEGAL REVIEW: CDP researchers reviewed previous studies on tenant conditions and current housing policies in order to build a platform of recommendations to combat predatory equity practices.

Did Research support CFR’s organizing efforts?

  • The survey project provided opportunities to base build and educate community members. The focus groups provided member leaders with the opportunity to learn facilitation skills and a deepened understanding of the various tactics predatory equity landlords use to harass tenants.
  • SNYC and CDP researchers hosted a community meeting for over 80 tenant members and leaders across New York City in order to discuss the results of the research and brainstorm ways to organize across boroughs to increase tenant power and fight predatory equity practices. The meeting featured a presentation of the report’s findings as well as a gallery walk of infographics summarizing the data that was collected by SNYC organizers and members. The meeting also launched a citywide tenant union of tenant leaders in order to strengthen relationships between communities across boroughs.

Did research impact policy change?

The report outlines the coalition’s three legislative bills that would increase scrutiny on predatory equity landlords, as well as lenders who finance predatory equity purchases:

  • Intro 1210 – Owner Watch Lists. This bill would require the Department of Housing Preservation & Development (HPD) to create a watch list on their website for owners of multiple dwelling buildings (6 or more units) who are engaged in predatory equity practices.
  • Intro 1211 – Conspiracy to Harass. This bill would create a rebuttable presumption (believed to be true until proven otherwise) regarding tenant harassment for certain buildings that meet criteria defined in Intro 1210.
  • Intro 1212 – Lender Watch List. This bill would require the Department of Housing Preservation & Development (HPD) to create and maintain a watch list on their website of lenders who provide financial support to owners engaged in predatory equity practices. The lender watch list would contain information about which landlords and buildings the lender was financing, and this information would be shared with federal and state agencies overseeing banking rules and regulations.

Read the report here.

Additional Resource: 7.1 Media and Communication

The following is a list of trainings and resources on media and communications relevant for social justice organizations:

  • The SPIN Project: Develops communications skills, infrastructure and leadership, leaving stronger organizations with the ability to amplify their work with messages that evolve from the grassroots.  The SPIN project has a variety of books and resources on their website.

Available online at:

  • Talking the Walk: A Communications Guide for Racial Justice

This is a very useful book with many workshops and practical media trainings and Tool from a project called Interrupt. The book “collects and synthesizes best practices, recent research, and case studies into capacity building Tool for racial justice advocates. It is an attempt to build a bridge between the researchers and practitioners conducting cutting edge media work and the individuals who lead organizing and advocacy. The goal of this work is to develop the capacity of racial justice advocates to engage the media in order to promote dialogue and public policy addressing racism.”

Available online at:

  • Re:Imagining change: an introduction to story-based strategy

This is a great publication from smartMeme in the Bay Area. “Re:Imagining Change is an introduction to the ideas and methods of the smartMeme Strategy & Training Project.  smartMeme was founded to innovate social change strategies in response to the movement building and messaging demands of the globalized information age.”

Available online at: